Tariff portfolio simplification: from 47 tariffs to 11 without revenue loss
Anonymised engagement: operator with 47 active tariffs, excessive operational complexity and customer confusion. An 8-month simplification.
Context
Operator accumulated 47 active tariffs over 5 years. Every launch of something new added a plan; legacy plans were not retired. Customer service spends 30% of time explaining differences. Marketing cannot communicate value in focus.
CMO asks: “simplify, but do not drop ARPU”.
Diagnostic (4 weeks)
The audit showed:
- 47 active tariffs cover 18 distinct customer profiles. 60% of plans are variations of one theme.
- Top 11 tariffs — 91% of revenue. The other 36 — 9%.
- “Upward” migration (to a pricier plan) — natural, happens. “Downward” — blocked by UX, the customer loses deals.
Insight: simplification = consolidation, not destruction of value.
Approach (8 months)
Months 1-2. Target portfolio design. 11 plans cover 18 profiles, with graceful overlap.
Months 2-3. Migration matrix. Each of the 47 plans → one of the 11 target plans with a no-loss guarantee (customer cannot end up worse off).
Months 3-5. Communication wave. Personalised notifications: “your plan is moving to [new plan]; you additionally get X”. Optionally — opt-in to a better plan.
Months 5-7. Auto-migration for opt-out customers with a soft touch. Customer service trained on the new portfolio.
Months 7-8. Decommission of leftovers, monitoring NPS / churn / ARPU.
Results
- Active tariffs: 47 → 11.
- ARPU: -1% (acceptable, projected was -3 to +2).
- Churn in migration period: +0.3% (small spike, normalised).
- Customer service handle time per call: −22%.
- Marketing campaign clarity: significant qualitative improvement.
- 18 months later — new customer re-acquisition rate +14% (clearer value proposition).
What is critical
No-loss guarantee. Without it: regulator concerns + customer complaints.
Communication wave with personalisation. A “generic plan change” notification is a disaster.
CEO public commitment. Without visible top cover, every sub-stakeholder defends their old plan.
How SamaraliSoft engages
An engagement of this class — 6-9 months. Diagnostic 3-4 weeks, design 4-6 weeks, migration execution.
Related
- /en/insights/telecom-tariff-architecture/ — tariff architecture
- /en/use-cases/telecom-tariff-migration-recommender/ — recommender
- /en/insights/telecom-portfolio-discipline/ — portfolio discipline
- /en/cases/telecom-cvm-rebuild-engagement/ — CVM rebuild
Similar challenge?
Tell me what's going on. I'll review the situation and suggest a concrete path forward.
Usually respond within a few hours