Modernization gov procurement: от paper к outcome-based

Где госзакупки в УЗ сейчас

Electronic procurement framework existing (xarid.uz и аналоги). Tenders posted, bids accepted electronically.

But:

• Many procurements awarded к incumbent vendors with «established relationships».
• Specifications written к narrow vendor base.
• Outcome-based contracting rare — process-based dominant.
• Vendor diversity limited.
• Innovation procurement (новых vendors с new approaches) затруднён.

Что можно изменить

Outcome-based contracts. «Деliver outcome X в timeframe Y» вместо «do tasks A,B,C».

Vendor pre-qualification independent. Не only «working с government before».

SME participation. Lower barriers, fast-track для small bids.

Innovation procurement framework. Sandbox для new approaches.

Transparency dashboards. Public visibility of awarded contracts, performance.

Vendor performance tracking. Multi-procurement vendor scoring.

Anti-corruption discipline. Conflict-of-interest declarations enforced.

Где трещины

Political resistance — incumbent vendors имеют relationships.

Procurement officers risk-averse. Innovation procurement — careers risk.

Capacity для outcome-based contracts limited.

Citizen / civil society watchdog weak.

Что обсуждать

Pilot outcome-based contracting for select sectors.

Innovation sandbox formal framework.

Vendor performance database.

Anti-corruption discipline strengthening.

International best practice adoption — UK GDS approach, Korea ePEEPS, Estonia.

Связанное

• /insights/government-after-egov/ — after e-gov
• /expertise/government-procurement/ — procurement expertise
• /insights/government-trust-public-services/ — trust
• /architecture/government-procurement-platform/ — platform