Expertise

Project Recovery

I step into projects that are stuck. I find the root cause, restructure the approach, and deliver results.

Обсудить

Half the projects I step into are projects someone started but couldn’t deliver. The typical picture: a company spent 8 months and 70% of budget, and only login and a couple of reference books work. The development team is burned out, the client has lost trust, and the project manager is writing progress reports that describe progress that doesn’t exist.

A characteristic case: a large company was implementing a CRM system through a well-known vendor. After 10 months — not a single working business process. The cause turned out to be not in the technology: requirements were gathered formally, architecture was drawn beautifully, but nobody figured out how the business actually works. The system was designed for an ideal process that didn’t exist in the company. My diagnosis took 10 days. We identified 3 critical processes out of 15, redesigned them, and launched the first module to production in 6 weeks.

The root cause is almost never the technology. In 80% of cases it’s one of three things: unclear requirements, absence of an owner with authority to make decisions, or a gap between what the business wants and what the team is building. Diagnosis isn’t a code audit. It’s conversations with people: the client, the team, the users. It’s in these conversations that you see where and when the project went wrong.

Honesty is the main tool. I won’t say “we’ll fix everything” — I’ll say what can be saved, what needs rebuilding, and what should be thrown out. Sometimes the best advice is to stop the project and start over with the right foundation. That’s painful, but cheaper than another six months working in a dead end.

How It Should Work

A project should move in iterations with measurable results at each stage. If there are no results — you need to stop and investigate, not continue by inertia.

Where Companies Typically Go Wrong

01
No clear requirements — built 'something like that,' everyone understood it differently
02
Architecture not thought through — system can't scale and falls apart under load
03
No ownership — nobody is accountable for the final result
04
Team is working but in the wrong direction — no connection between tasks and business goals
05
Client and contractor speak different languages — requirements get lost in translation
06
Vendor lock-in — contractor holds the project hostage
07
Loss of key people — knowledge of the system left with them
08
Scope creep — project grew 3× from original, but budget and timeline unchanged

What I Do in These Situations

First step — 1–2 week diagnosis: what's done, what works, where the gap between plan and reality lies. Second — honest assessment: what can be saved, what rebuilt, what discarded. Third — recovery plan with clear milestones and success criteria. Fourth — relaunch with first result in 4–6 weeks.

Team role: The team restructures around the new plan. I oversee key decisions and milestones.

What the Client Gets

1–2 week diagnosis — root cause of problems identified
Exit plan with prioritized milestones
First working result 4–6 weeks after relaunch
Restored trust between client and team
Reduced budget burn through focus on what matters
← All Areas

Готовы обсудить вашу задачу?

Расскажите, что не работает или что нужно построить. Первый разговор — без обязательств.

Обычно отвечаю в течение нескольких часов

Обсудить задачу
Выберите удобный способ связи
Telegram
Быстрый ответ
Быстро
WhatsApp
Голос и документы
📞
Позвонить
+998 99 838-11-88